<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cloud Computing Viewpoint</title>
<link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/</link>
<description>Latest articles from Cloud Computing Viewpoint</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 CLOUD COMPUTING JOURNAL</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:24:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>CLOUD COMPUTING JOURNAL</generator>
<ttl>10</ttl>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>

<item>
<title>Cloud Computing: The Nine Features of an Ideal PaaS Cloud</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/613436.htm</guid><link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/613436.htm</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>What sort of cloud computer(s) should we be building or expecting from vendors? Are there issues of lock-in that should concern customers of either SaaS clouds or PaaS clouds? I&apos;ve been thinking about this problem as the CEO of a PaaS cloud computing company for some time. Clouds should be open. They shouldn&apos;t be proprietary. More broadly, I believe no vendor currently does everything that&apos;s required to serve customers well.</description>

</item><item>
<title>Twenty Experts Define Cloud Computing</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/612375.htm</guid><link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/612375.htm</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>It is the infrastructural paradigm shift that is sweeping across the Enterprise IT world, but how is it best defined? I refer of course to &apos;Cloud Computing&apos; - the phenomenon that has as many definitions as there are squares on a chess-board. To try and narrow it down we bring here a round-up of some recent attempts to bring welcome precision where there risks being unnecessary vagueness.</description>

</item><item>
<title>Cloud Computing - The Jargon is Back!</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/613070.htm</guid><link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/613070.htm</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Cloud computing, utility computing, SaaS, on-demand, grid computing, etc. The jargon is back. But does it really matter any more than it did 10 years ago when you couldn&apos;t grab a bite to eat at the local Silicon Valley deli without hearing those three special letters &apos;ASP&apos; that were at the forefront of our collective brain when we talked about applications running in the cloud. (They usually came right after the other three letters: IPO, but let&apos;s not go there.)</description>

</item><item>
<title>Opinion: Cloud Computing in 2008 - Not For the Faint-Hearted</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/611009.htm</guid><link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/611009.htm</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>I think that cloud computing is going to be &apos;the way ahead&apos; for most businesses and individuals in the coming year or two. It makes a lot of sense. However, right now, in 2008, I think it&apos;s a very brave person who would entrust their business data to one of the thousands of micro-businesses offering &apos;cloud computing&apos; services.</description>

</item><item>
<title>Viewpoint: Information Technology Is &quot;Broken&quot;</title>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/608838.htm</guid><link>http://cloudcomputing.sys-con.com/read/608838.htm</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
<description>Information Technology is fantastic, absolutely essential, and largely responsible for this country&apos;s increase in productivity over the past decade or so. It&apos;s also broken. IT is overly complex, difficult to implement correctly, and expensive to maintain over its short lifespan.</description>

</item></channel></rss>